The discussion about whether or not stronger gun laws should be used in force to protect all citizens is a very controversal one. There are people on both sides of the arugement who have very strong feelings.

Guns have been used by humans in many different ways. Firstly, they are needed in the military, on the farm and for sporting purpose. For example, we all know that it is necessary for soliders to have guns. Without guns, they cannot even protect thenselves, how can I wish them to protect the whole country? In the second place, a reduction in gun ownership would only occur if there were enough police to enforce the stronger laws. But the true is, our country cannot provide so many policemen to enforce this important procedure, so it is not practical at all. Last but not least, the only way to prevent crime is to reduce the need of crime, that is, to reduce proverty. Gun ownership makes no difference.

Many people, however, argue that people should not have their own guns. First of all, crime is on the increase in cities, and the percentage of robberies in which arms are used is rising, too. In the modren society, a great many bank robberies are happened by the criminals with their own guns. Not only do they get all the money away,but also can lead to people’s injuries or even death. So it is very important to establish stronger gun laws and put them in force to protect people’s lives. The most important is that guns kill. Since we cannot prohibit their manufacture we must have effective, that is, stronger gun laws. What’s more, almost everyone can buy a gun if they can provide proof of the need to own one. It is too easy to buy a gun.

In my opinion, stronger gun laws should be used in force to protect all people. If there is no rules to limit the use of guns, our beautiful world will turn into a place full of danger and threat. So people cannot have or use their guns freely, only in this way can we build a better life for ourselves.