来源： 谢振礼老师转载Simon老师作文并提供

关注新浪微博@无忧雅思写作顾问谢振礼 并@ 5位小伙伴，即可获得整套9分作文材料及谢振礼老师独家360篇谢振礼原创范文

谢振礼老师作文批改、雅思托福个性写作模板服务，请咨询客服QQ：157005297


Essay question:
 
Several languages are in danger of extinction because they are spoken by very few numbers of people.  Some people say that governments should spend public money on saving these languages, while others believe that would be a waste of money.  Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
 
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your knowlecge and experience (to support your opinion).
 
Example answer:
 
It is true that some minority languages may disappear in the near future.  Although it can be argued that governments could save money by allowing this to happen, I believe that these languages should be protected and preserved.
 
There are several reasons why saving minority languages could be seen as a waste of money.  Firstly, if a language is only spoken by a small number of people, expensive education programmes will be needed to make sure that more people learn it, and the state will have to pay for facilities, teachers and marketing.  This money might be better spent on other public services.  Secondly, it would be much cheaper and more efficient for countries to have just one language.  Governments could cut out all kinds of costs related to communicating with each minority group.
 
Despite the above arguments, I believe that governments should try to preserve languages that are less widely spoken.  A language is much more than simply a means of communication; it has a vital connection with the cultural identity of the people who speak it.  If a language disappears, a whole way of life will disappear with it, and we will lose the cultural diversity that makes societies more interesting.  By spending money to protect minority languages, governments can also preserve traditions, customs and behaviours that are part of a country's history.
 
In conclusion, it may save money in the short term if we allow minority languages to disappear, but in the long term this would have an extremely negative impact on our cultural heritage.
 
(258 words, band 9)